Tumblelog by Soup.io
Newer posts are loading.
You are at the newest post.
Click here to check if anything new just came in.
elysia372
Recently, a friend was thinking about having her newborn son circumcised. I felt very strongly that I should try and convince her not to do it. At the time, I did not have the information to be able to provide a convincing enough argument. After conversing with some dieticians my friend decided to go ahead using the procedure to be with her son, citing items like infection was more likely in boys with foreskins along with the confusion he'd he feel when he looked over his father and saw them to be not the same. These seem to be some with the most common reasons people do go ahead with circumcision. Another common and well-known reason is due to religious beliefs and customs. However, interestingly, you will find there's group called Jews Against Circumcision that are working to counsel families about producing the decision. In their book, "Birthing from Within", Pam England C.N.M., M.A. and Rob Horowitz PhD. write that circumcision got into practice as a result of anti-masturbation hysteria within the late 1800's. People worried that if a boy had a foreskin, when he cleaned his penis it could lead to masturbation and that masturbation would cause insanity. It was also thought in the 19th century that circumcision was obviously a way to avoid sexually transmitted diseases. Both of these stuff has since been disproved. In the case of my good friend there was probably nothing I could have believed to her to switch her mind. But I hope that a few of the evidence below might give any parents that are still thinking about the operation pause for thought. Here are 5 explanations why I would NOT have my newborn son circumcised. It is believed by some that the pain response in babies can be a reflex or that babies tend not to remember pain experienced because of circumcision inside the long term. This is an outmoded belief, but even recent books like "Baby Wise", by authors Gary Ezzo, M.A. and Robert Bucknam, M.D. advise that "circumcision is not the traumatic experience that some portray". They suggest circumcision is minor surgery and liken any memory of discomfort because of the procedure on the baby's heel being pricked with a heel stick. What they don't mention, however, is the prick of an baby's heel is a thing which heals leaving no scar. The heel is not known to offer the number of sensitive nerve endings that happen to be found inside foreskin. In her book, "Gentle Birth Choices", Barbara Harper, R.N., writes that parents should become aware of the potential pain and trauma the task of circumcision might have on their sons. Sarah J. Buckley M.D. writes that severe stresses in infants (which include circumcision) must be avoided where possible in the first one to two years of the youngsters life. According to her this reduces exposure to hyperarousal/dissociation chemistry within the brain, which results in cell death in the limbic area of the brain and possibly to mental health concerns which may keep going for a lifetime. According to Harper, current research points too babies can easily experience pain at birth and also within the womb, from as soon as twenty weeks gestation. She writes that the pain of undergoing circumcision might cause deep psychological scarring knowning that the quality of the newborn's birth experience will surely have a significant relation to the individual's behaviour in later life.The physical healing of circumcision is said to take 7-10 days. The same can not be said for virtually any emotional pain or trauma that this child may feel due to this operation. This can be a decision parents lead to their child which will work for a lifetime the other which it's impossible to undo. Parents examine possible risks (which are suggested by many authors to be disproved or insignificant compared on the risks of going ahead while using operation) and as a result decide to take away a part of their child's body which may never be put back.Some in the risks associated with circumcision are haemorrhage, infection, septicaemia, gangrene, irritation in the head of the penis (through having wet diapers), pain on urination and skin grafting if too much with the foreskin is taken away. Penny Simkin, P.T., Janet Whalley, R.N., B.S.N., and Ann Keppler, R.N., M.N. Of the Childbirth Education Association of Seattle write that complications from circumcision arise in 2-6 of the 1000 circumcisions. Harper suggests that the youngsters future sexual experience ought to be considered. Removing the foreskin means taking away a sensitive part of the male body. She quotes Canadian pathologist John Taylor, who writes about the foreskin being a sensory extension with the penis. "Its inner mucosal surface includes a tightly pleated zone near the tip, abundant in nerve endings. " I have not spoken using a single man that has a foreskin who is sorry that they has it. Is it the right of a parent to make a choice for a child which could eliminate the chance for increased sexual enjoyment in the future (read more: http://suplementy-diety.org.pl)? Human the male is born using a foreskin. Why would they've got evolved to possess a foreskin if there have been not some practical reason or benefit to having it? England and Horowitz claim that circumcision is not routine or medically necessary. They cite research through the American College of Pediatrics (1971) concluding that "There isn't valid medical indication for circumcision inside newborn. "Some research, like that cited in "Baby Wise" shows that there seems to get some modest benefits to circumcision prefer that it may reduce the risk of bladder infection and eliminate cancer in the penis. There is widespread disagreement with circumcision that is why, which many say just isn't even be accurate. Simkin, Whalley and Keppler write that we now have some studies which suggest a slight increase inside incidence of cancer in the penis in uncircumcised males, but there are other studies which suggest the opposite. Even the studies showing an surge in penile cancer associate it with poor long-term hygienic care from the penis. If parents can make a commitment to helping their son or daughter learn proper hygiene, next the should not be a problem. In "Birthing from Within", Rob Horowitz PhD. shares a story of the time his young son noticed that his penis looked completely different from his father's. The father tells his son any time he was young most men had the top of their penis skin take off when they were babies but that they can hadn't allow that be done to him. The son then asked the dad if it hurt. After the daddy replied, the son said, "Thank you for not allowing them to do that if you ask me."Pam England C.N.M., M.A. & Rob Horowitz PhD. "Birthing from Within".Sarah J. Buckley, M.D.,"Gentle Birth, Gentle Mothering".Barbara Harper, R.N., "Gentle Birth Choices".Penny Simkin, P.T., Janet Whalley, R.N., B.S.N., & Ann Keppler, R.N., M.N., "Pregnancy, Childbirth and the Newborn: The Complete Guide".Gary Ezzo, M.A. & Robert Bucknam, M.D., "Baby Wise".

Don't be the product, buy the product!

Schweinderl